Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$25.15
▲ $0.04 (+0.2%)
Market data updated: 09/17 05:59 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$2.26B
Day Range
$25.11 - $25.15
52-Week Range
$24.49 - $25.99
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
ADAMH is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
+0.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 4/24 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 196.5%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $19.92 vs. price $25.15 (-20.8%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (74/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
42
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $25.11
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 3 to 32 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
50
Value
38
Momentum
6
Risk
50
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
51
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Adamas Trust, Inc.** has centered on its financial performance and strategic moves. The company has seen its stock underperforming in the finance sector, with analysts like UBS adjusting their price target to $9.50 while maintaining a neutral rating. Highlights include a $90 million debt offering, an 11.1% dividend increase to $0.30 per share, and discussions around its high-yield, high-risk "baby bonds" due to elevated leverage. Analysts also debated its stock outlook, with some predicting volatility.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Adamas Trust, Inc. - 9.875% Senior Notes Due 2030. News trend score: 62. Reason: 3 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
28
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
96
Fundamentals
51
Technical
6
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-2%
Market Narrative
54
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+4
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s extreme anchoring (98) suggests traders are fixated on resistance, ignoring valuation gaps (+29% above DCF). FOMO (37) and overconfidence (26) hint at speculative chasing, while modest peer outperformance (herding 26) keeps momentum contained. The key question: will traders break resistance or reset expectations? Narrative-reality divergence (gap: 8) may amplify anchoring if fundamentals fail to justify the price.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 10:48 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Adamas Trust Increases Quarterly Common Stock Dividend by 11.1% to $0.30 Per Share"
"Adamas Trust Prices $90 Million Debt Offering"
"Record EAD Growth and Strategic Investments"
"UBS Adjusts Price Target on Adamas Trust to $9.50 From $8.50"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 14/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles, the model estimates that growth‑focused investors such as Peter Lynch (97) and Edgar Lawrence Smith (88) see ADAMH as a strong growth or decade‑hold candidate, while value‑oriented frameworks like Benjamin Graham (33) and Graham’s Enterprising Investor variant (13) flag the stock as failing defensive criteria and not cheap enough. The mixed opinions from Howard Marks (58) and his market‑cycle lens (41) reflect concerns about already high expectations and the stock’s position in the cycle. Limited fundamental or balance‑sheet data leads Fisher and Bagehot to issue neutral or non‑committal verdicts, and momentum‑based thinkers such as Charles Mackay (66) note rising crowd excitement, whereas contrarian traders like Jesse Livermore (51) and Thorstein Veblen (45) see no clear trend or profit translation. Overall, the divergence stems from the differing weight each methodology places on growth prospects, valuation safety margins, and available financial information.
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 100
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 97
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 90
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 88
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 86
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 76
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 74
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 69
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 64
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 60
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 50
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 45
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 44
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 35
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 14
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 278 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$25.06
Range Bottom
$25.69
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
10.4%
ROA
1.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.12
Cash
$210.33M
Total Debt
$735.83M
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.52
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.6.2026 | $0.617 |
| 14.6.2026 | $0.617 |
| 13.3.2026 | $0.617 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.617 |
| 15.12.2025 | $0.617 |
| 14.12.2025 | $0.617 |
| 15.9.2025 | $0.569 |
| 14.9.2025 | $0.569 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$25.15
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$19.92
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-20.8%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $138.47M | $127.04M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $149.73M | $126.02M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $159.08M | $122.84M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $166.04M | $117.63M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $170.19M | $110.61M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$125.89M
Terminal Value
$2.68B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.74B
Enterprise Value
$2.35B
Net Debt
$525.50M
Equity Value
$1.82B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$15.59
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$15.16
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 16 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
MT Newswires · 19.8.2026
Zacks · 17.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.8.2026
MT Newswires · 12.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 12.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 11.8.2026
Zacks · 4.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 1.8.2026
Zacks · 31.7.2026
GuruFocus.com · 30.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.7.2026
Zacks · 29.7.2026
Associated Press · 29.7.2026
Adamas Trust, Inc. - 9.875% Senior Notes Due 2030 (ADAMH) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 42/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ADAMH currently scores 42/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ADAMH's estimated fair value is $19.92, which is 20.8% below the current price of $25.15. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ADAMH's technical score is 6/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 196.5%; Free cash flow growth: 1290.3%; Net income growth: 340.3%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $19.92 vs. price $25.15 (-20.8%); Calmar: 0.16 (3y annualized return 0.7% / max drawdown 4.2%); Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — ADAMH has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cheng Gena | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.6.2026 | 14,238 | +14,238 | — |
| Greenberg Audrey | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.6.2026 | 14,238 | +14,238 | — |
| Clement Michael B. | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.6.2026 | 14,238 | +14,238 | — |
| Pendergast Lisa A | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.6.2026 | 14,238 | +14,238 | — |
| Mumma Steven R | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.6.2026 | 14,238 | +14,238 | — |
| Norcutt Steven G | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.6.2026 | 14,238 | +14,238 | — |
| Clement Michael B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.6.2026 | 18,678 | +18,678 | — |
| Clement Michael B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.6.2026 | 18,678 | -18,678 | — |
| Serrano Jason T | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.1.2026 | 5,827 | -5,827 | $8.41 |
| Nario-Eng Kristine Rimando | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.1.2026 | 751 | -751 | $8.41 |
| Mah Nicholas | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.1.2026 | 2,237 | -2,237 | $8.41 |
| Nario-Eng Kristine Rimando | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.1.2026 | 61,989 | +61,989 | — |
| Serrano Jason T | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.1.2026 | 216,711 | +216,711 | — |
| Mah Nicholas | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.1.2026 | 127,321 | +127,321 | — |
| Serrano Jason T | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 84,737 | -84,737 | — |
| Serrano Jason T | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 41,032 | -41,032 | — |
| Serrano Jason T | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.1.2026 | 44,640 | -44,640 | $7.30 |
| Serrano Jason T | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.1.2026 | 21,455 | -21,455 | $7.30 |
| Serrano Jason T | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 34,179 | +34,179 | — |
| Serrano Jason T | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 34,179 | -34,179 | — |
| Mah Nicholas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 48,948 | -48,948 | — |
| Serrano Jason T | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 41,032 | +41,032 | — |
| Serrano Jason T | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 84,737 | +84,737 | — |
| Serrano Jason T | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.1.2026 | 19,140 | -19,140 | $7.30 |
| Mah Nicholas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 32,122 | -32,122 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
176 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,190 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
46.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 64.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology