Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · CBOE
$42.12
▼ $0.24 (-0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/16 08:43 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/16/2026
Market Cap
$2.57B
Day Range
$41.75 - $43.06
52-Week Range
$35.81 - $54.71
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+16.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/18 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Golden Cross
SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 200
Price is below the 200-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
AAAU’s investor score of 56 reflects a mixed but cautiously optimistic profile, where robust growth metrics and technical momentum are partially offset by structural valuation and risk considerations. The stock stands out in the **growth** category (66), driven by exceptional EPS growth (224.5%) and net income expansion (383.4%), signaling strong operational scaling. However, **technical** indicators (51) reveal conflicting signals: while the RSI (52.4) and position above the 50-day average suggest positive momentum, the negative MACD histogram and sub-200-day average positioning indicate underlying downside pressure. **Fundamental** strength (54) is anchored by a high ROA (30.8%), but this is tempered by a low P/E ratio (2.6) in **valuation** (55), which may reflect either undervaluation or limited profit expectations. **News sentiment** (62) is split, with positive central bank gold demand trends counterbalanced by geopolitical and macroeconomic concerns. **Risk** (58) is moderate, with low volatility (ATR 1.9%) but a notable historical drawdown (26.3%), highlighting potential volatility sensitivity. The interplay of these factors creates a nuanced outlook where growth potential is real but contingent on resolving technical and macroeconomic headwinds.
The stock shows mixed technical signals: positive momentum (RSI 52.4, above 50-day average) clashes with negative MACD and a sub-200-day average, indicating short-term strength but longer-term weakness.
This duality suggests traders must weigh near-term buying opportunities against sustained downside risks.
Strong ROA (30.8%) highlights efficient asset utilization, but no other metrics (e.g., debt, margins) are provided to assess broader financial health.
High ROA alone may not sustain growth if operational leverage or market conditions deteriorate.
EPS (224.5%) and net income (383.4%) growth are extraordinary, signaling aggressive revenue or cost-cutting expansion.
Such growth rates are rare and may not be sustainable without external validation (e.g., revenue data).
The P/E ratio of 2.6 is extremely low, suggesting either undervaluation or minimal profit expectations relative to peers.
A low P/E could attract value investors but may also indicate market skepticism about future earnings.
News sentiment is balanced, with positive central bank gold demand trends outweighed by geopolitical and macroeconomic risks.
Gold’s price is highly sensitive to macroeconomic shifts, which could amplify volatility.
Low volatility (ATR 1.9%) contrasts with a high historical drawdown (26.3%), indicating potential for sharp corrections despite stable recent performance.
Investors should prepare for volatility spikes, especially if macroeconomic conditions worsen.
StockIQ conclusion
AAAU presents a compelling yet cautious case, with its strength rooted in exceptional growth metrics and efficient asset utilization. However, technical contradictions, macroeconomic sensitivities, and structural valuation questions create a nuanced profile. Investors should focus on validating the growth figures with additional data while monitoring geopolitical and technical signals for clarity on sustainability. The stock’s performance hinges on resolving its mixed signals, particularly whether short-term momentum can overcome longer-term downside pressures.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
50
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
66
Quality
No data available
Value
55
Momentum
34
Risk
58
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
54
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage on the Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (GLD) highlights gold’s strong performance amid geopolitical tensions, particularly in the Middle East, where rising oil prices and conflict escalation have driven demand for safe-haven assets. Central banks’ continued gold accumulation and ETF inflows are cited as key bullish factors, despite short-term challenges like higher bond yields and a stronger dollar. The focus remains on gold’s potential for further gains due to de-dollarization concerns and global uncertainty.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF. News trend score: 50. Reason: The mix of positive and negative articles is balanced — 8 vs. 8 out of the last 20 articles.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
11
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
14
Fundamentals
54
Technical
34
Valuation
55
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+1%
Market Narrative
36
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-14
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for AAAU suggests a **tug-of-war between FOMO and early panic**, with neither fully dominant. Elevated volume (1.19x) and positive sentiment (62/100) contrast with negative momentum (-1.7% ROC) and neutral RSI (52), indicating cautious optimism mixed with unease. The narrative gap (-3) hints at a slight disconnect between market expectations and fundamentals, but no clear bias dominates. The key question: *Is the volume spike a buying opportunity or a prelude to further selling?*
Updated: 09/06/2026, 12:41 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Oil prices remain elevated... amid a pickup in hostilities between the US and Iran (article 6)"
"Central banks continued their gold accumulation in July with net buying reported at 23t (article 5)"
"Gold just rallied by over 10% after falling into correction territory (article 1)"
"Central bank buying and ETF inflows keep gold attractive (article 8)"
📈 7D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 12/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles, the model estimates that growth‑focused frameworks like Peter Lynch’s see strong upside, reflected in a perfect 100 score, while value‑oriented reads from Graham and his enterprising variant cannot form a conclusion due to missing balance‑sheet data, also yielding 100 but with a disclaimer. Mid‑range scores from Marks, Nelson, Housel and Loeb suggest a reasonably priced, low‑risk position, whereas the efficient‑market view of Bogle and Malkiel flags only modest evidence for outperformance. Conversely, trend‑following and technical disciplines such as Livermore and Schwager assign low scores, indicating a negative trend and a lack of a compelling setup. These divergences arise because each methodology weighs different factors—growth prospects, valuation completeness, cycle timing, and price momentum—leading to a spectrum of assessments for the same stock.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 100
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 100
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 88
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 78
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 71
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 65
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 29
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 12
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 274 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
—
ROA
30.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$16.58
Cash
$0
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
—
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
—
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 4 neutral, 8 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 50/100, rated "Moderate" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AAAU currently scores 50/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
AAAU's technical score is 34/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 224.5%; Net income growth: 383.4%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 200-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; -1.7% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for AAAU.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,194,395 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 582,097 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
52.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 52.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology