Loading data...
Loading data...
StockIQ Legends — Time Machine
Real point-in-time data only: the price NVDA actually traded at that year (split-adjusted back to its true as-traded value), the fundamentals that were actually publicly filed with the SEC by that date, and technical indicators computed only from price bars up to that date — never a later, not-yet-known figure, never a guess.
Is growth translating to real profit, or is it empire-building?
2016
85
/ 100
data completeness 70%
2017
34
/ 100
data completeness 70%
2018
93
/ 100
data completeness 70%
2019
93
/ 100
data completeness 70%
2020
80
/ 100
data completeness 70%
2021
30
/ 100
data completeness 70%
2022
86
/ 100
data completeness 70%
2023
93
/ 100
data completeness 70%
2024
30
/ 100
data completeness 70%
2025
93
/ 100
data completeness 70%
🎯 Want to see a real portfolio, not just one score?
The Backtest engine ranks a whole universe, picks the top stocks, and checks the real return — not just one stock's score.
⚠️ Important
This is a simulation of documented, published investment principles applied to real historical data as it actually stood on each date — not a forecast, not a claim that these investors would actually have bought or sold, and not investment advice. Some methodologies (Mackay, Marks-Cycle, Marks, Loeb, Veblen, Smith, Housel) show a lower data-completeness ceiling than the live site's current-data version, because a real point-in-time source doesn't exist yet for one or two of their factors (historical news sentiment, insider transactions, dividend records, a point-in-time DCF, or a point-in-time beta) — that's an honest, disclosed gap, never padded or guessed.