Loading data...
Loading data...
StockIQ Legends — Time Machine
Real point-in-time data only: the price NVDA actually traded at that year (split-adjusted back to its true as-traded value), the fundamentals that were actually publicly filed with the SEC by that date, and technical indicators computed only from price bars up to that date — never a later, not-yet-known figure, never a guess.
| Investor | Fit score | Data completeness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Benjamin Graham | 72 / 100 | 100% | 10-year view → |
| Philip Fisher | 96 / 100 | 100% | 10-year view → |
| Peter Lynch | 96 / 100 | 100% | 10-year view → |
| Graham (Enterprising) | 32 / 100 | 100% | 10-year view → |
| Walter Bagehot | 99 / 100 | 100% | 10-year view → |
| Thorstein Veblen | 93 / 100 | 70% | 10-year view → |
| Edgar L. Smith | 92 / 100 | 75% | 10-year view → |
| Gerald Loeb | 65 / 100 | 60% | 10-year view → |
| Morgan Housel | 64 / 100 | 80% | 10-year view → |
| Jesse Livermore | 24 / 100 | 100% | 10-year view → |
| S. A. Nelson | 64 / 100 | 100% | 10-year view → |
| Jack Schwager | 46 / 100 | 100% | 10-year view → |
| Charles Mackay | 100 / 100 | 65% | 10-year view → |
| Howard Marks (Cycle) | 78 / 100 | 80% | 10-year view → |
| Howard Marks (Risk) | 100 / 100 | 30% | 10-year view → |
| Malkiel/Bogle (Efficient Market) | 61 / 100 | 100% | 10-year view → |
🎯 Want to see a real portfolio, not just one score?
The Backtest engine ranks a whole universe, picks the top stocks, and checks the real return — not just one stock's score.
⚠️ Important
This is a simulation of documented, published investment principles applied to real historical data as it actually stood on each date — not a forecast, not a claim that these investors would actually have bought or sold, and not investment advice. Some methodologies (Mackay, Marks-Cycle, Marks, Loeb, Veblen, Smith, Housel) show a lower data-completeness ceiling than the live site's current-data version, because a real point-in-time source doesn't exist yet for one or two of their factors (historical news sentiment, insider transactions, dividend records, a point-in-time DCF, or a point-in-time beta) — that's an honest, disclosed gap, never padded or guessed.